Skip to main content

Hungry reading

The page proofs of Real Port Talbot arrived in the post from my publisher two days ago and I am spending the weekend scouring each page, each word, each end-note number and reference for typos, omissions, clumsy errors, checking for letters and symbols lost in the transfer from Word to Quark, that the photographs are the right ones and in the right place and that each section falls on the right page number. 

It sounds like fiddly work but this is the kind of writing work I enjoy - proof-reading, editing, layouts. So much easier than the real writing, the struggle to get the right words in the right order and saying what I want them to say. It's not that I don't like the real writing - well, I like it when I'm lost in the flow of it - but I don't like the thought of it and getting myself to the desk to begin. I don't like the white screen, the blank page, the cranking up of gears, the slow lead in and the chopsy indolence of my internal critics who'd prefer me to play Lexulous or check Facebook. 

But what I also loved about writing Real Port Talbot was the research, the walking around, talking to people, climbing through fences, braving a splintering wind, rain-soaked, muddy-booted, photo-snapping, scribbled note-taking kind of research that gave me the framework for the stories that would shape the book. The writing started in my body. I often didn't know how to start talking about a particular place but after walking it, after being alone and open to its physical and emotional influences, I found a way to begin even if that was a confession of failure:

I can’t get a handle on Margam. It feels like a place of parts rather than a cohesive whole: a club and playing fields, a park and a run of shops, a hotel, a college and schools, and the A48, Margam Road, running straight through the middle of it all, an artery hell bent on taking you somewhere else.  (p.206)
I want to write more from the body. Writing that has its roots in my physical, intellectual and emotional relationship to the environment and the landscape and the people who populate them. I want to be serious and funny, interrogative and flippant, academic and entertaining. But I don't want to be the centre of my writing either. I want what I discover in the world to be at the heart of it.

Reading the proofs has reminded me what a gift I had in the opportunity to write this book, how the genre of psycho-geography allowed me to draw on every aspect of my writing career so far and contain it between two covers. Imaginative prose, memoir, poetry, journalistic commentary, historical exploration, confession, story telling. Can I do it again with another book, with different subject matter? I hope so.  

It's at this point that I should be able to neatly segue into the subject of food. The 'proof of the pudding' would be apt. But this post is about a different kind of nourishment.  

Hungry Writing Prompt
Write about what nourishes you.

Popular posts from this blog

Pie, pie glorious pie

So often when we talk about food we are talking about family. In fact that was how the hungry writer blog began, nearly six years ago: weekly memories or life stories linked by the theme of food. Food is nurture and love. It can be celebration and anxiety too. It can also be a battleground, as the parents of young children know so intimately! Which is rather a satisfying segue into the family featuring in this week's blogpost: The Radfords. Because if anyone understands the feeding of children, really, really understands, it has to be Sue Radford who, with her husband, Noel, has 19 children. You can read about the family on their website but don't rush off yet as what I really want to talk about is pie. And specifically Radford's pies.
Noel Radford has been a baker for 25 years and opened his own bakery in 1999 in Heysham, Lancashire and makes pies with locally sourced ingredients. That, along with his skill as a master baker, means that the pictures of the 'filled to t…

Eat, laugh, cry, remember: Baked Camembert

Once, on a holiday in Malta, I dressed Tony up in my gypsy skirt and stretchy white vest, used two satsumas for breasts and made up his eyes and lips with the brightest colours I had with me. Then I took a photograph. He didn’t seem to mind, in fact he seemed quite tickled by the fuss and attention to detail, but the quantity of rosé we’d shared at Snoopy’s restaurant on the seafront in Sliema earlier in the evening might have had something to do with that.

This was 1988. There were no digital cameras for instant viewing (and, praise be, instant deletion). The only instant photographs at the time came courtesy of Polaroid, with their packages of square film and box-like cameras, and slid out of the front of the machine on shiny thick card that everyone huddled over and watched develop. But they tended to be party cameras, appearing at Christmas, birthdays, engagements. You captured your holiday photos on a proper camera, one you had to load and feed film into, then unload and drop off…

The Mythic Biscuit: Oreos

My childhood biscuits were mainly plain but had lovely names: Marie, Nice, Rich Tea. Quiet biscuits. The kind of biscuits that would never interrupt a conversation. Polite, not pushy. At the other end of the spectrum, and only irregularly present, probably a result of practical economics, were cheeky Jammy Dodgers, irritable Garibaldis, and self-contented and reliable Bourbons. And even more irregularly, the flashy inhabitants of a Christmas Box of Biscuits: Pink Wafers. I ate them at the same time as not liking them very much, a bit like Miss World Contestants in sparkly dresses, too much eye make-up and a saccharine idea of world peace. 
I'm in the mood to think, and personify, 'biscuits' because the lovely team at Oreo sent me some samples of their new Oreo Thins. I hadn't heard of Oreos until the early 1990s when a friend asked if I would bring him back a packet from a Florida holiday. I forgot and pretended I couldn't find them. 'But they're everywher…